Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate

441 F.3d 1029, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 4167
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 22, 2006
Docket04-15044
StatusPublished

This text of 441 F.3d 1029 (Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate, 441 F.3d 1029, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 4167 (9th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

441 F.3d 1029

John DOE, a minor, by his mother and next friend, Jane DOE nfr Jane Doe, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Josephine Helelani Pauahi Rabago, Intervenor,
v.
KAMEHAMEHA SCHOOLS/BERNICE PAUAHI BISHOP ESTATE; Constance Lau, in her capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; Nainoa Thompson, in his capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; Diane J. Plotts, in her capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; Robert K.U. Kihune, in his capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate; J. Douglas Ing, in his capacity as Trustee of the Kamehameha Schools/Bernice Pauahi Bishop Estate, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-15044.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 22, 2006.

John W. Goemans, Esq., Kamuela, HI, Eric Grant, Esq., Attorney at Law, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Emmett B. Lewis, Miller & Chevalier, Chartered Metropolitan Square, Washington, DC, David Schulmeister, Esq., Cades, Schutte, Fleming and Wright, Honolulu, HI, Kathleen M. Sullivan, Stanford Law School, Stanford, CA, Jay L. Carlson, Esq., Crystal K. Rose, Esq., Bays, Deaver, Hiatt, Lung & Rose, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Notes:

1

Judge Clifton is recused

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 F.3d 1029, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 4167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-kamehameha-schoolsbernice-pauahi-bishop-estate-ca9-2006.