Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Doe v. Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc.

Doe v. Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc.

864 N.E.2d 637, 113 Ohio St. 3d 263
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 2, 2007
DocketNo. 2006-2300
StatusPublished

This text of 864 N.E.2d 637 (Doe v. Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc., 864 N.E.2d 637, 113 Ohio St. 3d 263 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers; and Loucas & Loucas Co., L.P.A., George E. Loucas, and Penny E. Loucas, for appellant Jane Doe. Walter & Haverfield, L.L.P., Jonathan D. Greenberg, and Leslie G. Wolfe, for appellants Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc., and Jesus A. Ramos, M.D. Tucker, Ellis & West, L.L.P., Matthew P. Moriarty, Susan M. Audey, Tariq M. Naeem, and Frank 0. Garritano, for appellee.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame, 112 Ohio St.3d 514, 2007-Ohio-607, 861 N.E.2d 519.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame
112 Ohio St. 3d 514 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
864 N.E.2d 637, 113 Ohio St. 3d 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-jesus-a-ramos-md-inc-ohio-2007.