Doe v. Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc.

864 N.E.2d 637, 113 Ohio St. 3d 263
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 2, 2007·No. No. 2006-2300·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers; and Loucas & Loucas Co., L.P.A., George E. Loucas, and Penny E. Loucas, for appellant Jane Doe. Walter & Haverfield, L.L.P., Jonathan D. Greenberg, and Leslie G. Wolfe, for appellants Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc., and Jesus A. Ramos, M.D. Tucker, Ellis & West, L.L.P., Matthew P. Moriarty, Susan M. Audey, Tariq M. Naeem, and Frank 0. Garritano, for appellee.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame, 112 Ohio St.3d 514, 2007-Ohio-607, 861 N.E.2d 519.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc., 864 N.E.2d 637, 113 Ohio St. 3d 263 (Ohio 2007).

864 N.E.2d 637 (Doe v. Jesus A. Ramos, M.D., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gehm v. Timberline Post & Frame
112 Ohio St. 3d 514 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)