Doe v. Hyassat

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided February 9, 2023·No. 1:18-cv-06110·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x JANE DOE, : : Plaintiff, : 18-CV-06110 (PGG) (OTW) : -against- : ORDER : MUTAZ HYASSAT, : Defendants. : : : --------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: This matter has been referred to me for Inquest following a default. (ECF 69). By April 10, 2023, Plaintiff shall file (1) proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and (2) an inquest memorandum setting forth proof of damages. Plaintiff’s proposed damages figures should be supported by documentary evidence and/or one or more affidavits establishing the proposed figures. Plaintiff must also include documentation supporting the requested attorney’s fees and costs. Plaintiff must serve these documents on the Defaulting Defendants and file a proof of service on the docket by April 10, 2023. Defendants’ opposition papers (if any) shall be filed by May 10, 2023. The Court hereby notifies the parties that it may conduct this inquest solely on the written submissions of the parties. See Action S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co., Inc., 951 F.2d 504, 508 (2d Cir. 1991). If any party seeks an evidentiary hearing on damages, such party must include the request in its papers, as well as provide reasons why a hearing is necessary and detail what types of additional evidence would be presented at the hearing. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on the Defaulting Defendants and file proof of service on the docket by February 16, 2023.

SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: February 9, 2023 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Hyassat, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Doe v. Hyassat (Doe v. Hyassat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related