Doe v. Holy See

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doe v. Holy See

13 A.D.3d 1109, 786 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16417

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doe v. Holy See. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 A.D.3d 793 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2004·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Robert F. Julian, J.), entered November 5, 2003. The order granted the motion of defendants Diocese of Syracuse and St. Patrick’s Church to dismiss the complaint against them and denied plaintiffs cross motion for limited discovery.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Doe v Holy See [State of Vatican City], 6 AD3d 1228 [2004]; Mars v Diocese of Rochester, 6 AD3d 1120 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 608 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Kehoe, Gorski and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Robert F. Julian, J.), entered November 5, 2003. The order granted the motion of defendants Diocese of Syracuse and St. Patrick’s Church to dismiss the complaint against them and denied plaintiffs cross motion for limited discovery.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs (see Doe v Holy See [State of Vatican City], 6 AD3d 1228 [2004]; Mars v Diocese of Rochester, 6 AD3d 1120 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 608 [2004]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Kehoe, Gorski and Martoche, JJ.

Doe v. Holy See, 13 A.D.3d 1109, 786 N.Y.S.2d 856, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

13 A.D.3d 1109 (Doe v. Holy See) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related