Doe v. Hhs

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJanuary 2, 2024
Docket20-0094V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Doe v. Hhs (Doe v. Hhs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. Hhs, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 20-94V Filed: November 27, 2023

************************* * * JANE DOE, * * * Petitioner, * * v. * * * SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * HUMAN SERVICES, * * * Respondent. * * ************************* *

Leah Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner Gabrielle Fielding, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On January 28, 2020, Jane Doe (“Petitioner”) filed a petition, seeking compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“the Vaccine Program”). 2 Pet., ECF No. 1. Petitioner alleges she suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccination she received on September 14, 2018. See Stipulation ¶ 2, 4, dated November 21, 2021 (ECF No. 53); see also Petition.

Respondent denies “petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the vaccine

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “not to be published,” it will nevertheless be posted

on the Court of Federal Claims’ website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. As provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the Decision in its present form will be available. Id.

2 The Vaccine Program comprises Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L.

No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10–34 (2012)) (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). All subsequent references to sections of the Vaccine Act shall be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa. caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that petitioner’s current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.” See Stipulation ¶ 6. Nonetheless, both parties, while maintaining their above-stated positions, agreed in a stipulation filed November 21, 2023 that the issues before them can be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding Petitioner compensation.

I have reviewed the file, and based upon that review, I conclude that the parties’ stipulation is reasonable. I therefore adopt it as my decision in awarding damages on the terms set forth therein.

The stipulation awards:

a lump sum of $90,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.

Stipulation ¶ 8. This award represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

I approve a Vaccine Program award in the requested amount set forth above to be made to Petitioner. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Katherine E. Oler Katherine E. Oler Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties may expedite entry of judgment by jointly filing notice renouncing their right to seek review. JN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) JANE DOE, ) ) Petitioner, ) No. 20-94V (ECF) v. ) Special Master Oler ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. }

STIPULATIQN

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. ("petitioner" or "Jane Doe"), filed a petition for vaccine compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-J0 to 34 (the

"Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to

petitioner's receipt of an influenza ("flu") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine

Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § I 00.3(a)

2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on September 14, 2018.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. The petition alleges that petitioner sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the Table, or in the alternative, that

petitioner's alleged shoulder injury was caused by the vaccine. The petition further alleges that

petitioner experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages arising out of the alleged vaccine injury. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the

vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that

petitioner's current condition is a sequela of a vaccine-related injury.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofj udgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has ti led an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)(l ), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of S90,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, . This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21 (a)( I), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and petitioner's attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can

reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1396
2 U.S.C. § 1396
§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-I
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-I
§ 300aa-J0
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-J0
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Doe v. Hhs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-hhs-uscfc-2024.