Doe v. Henke
This text of 732 N.W.2d 542 (Doe v. Henke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael T. DOE, and Patsy R. Doe, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
John HENKE, M.D., and Ann Arbor Orthopedic Surgery, Defendants-Appellants, and
Trinity Health, d/b/a St. Joseph Mercy Health System, d/b/a St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted in light of Miller v. Chapman Contracting, Inc., 477 Mich. 102, 730 N.W.2d 462 (2007). The motion to reverse and remand is DENIED.
We do not retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
732 N.W.2d 542, 478 Mich. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-henke-mich-2007.