Doe v. Helen Hayes Hospital

S.D. New York

Doe v. Helen Hayes Hospital

DecidedJanuary 13, 2022

Docket7:20-cv-02331

StatusUnknown

This text of Doe v. Helen Hayes Hospital (Doe v. Helen Hayes Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe v. Helen Hayes Hospital, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE, MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, AND ORDER

-against- 20-CV-02331 (PMH) DR. MARJORIE KING, et al.,

Defendants. PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: Counsel for plaintiff, outgoing counsel for defendants, and incoming counsel for defendants appeared today via telephone for an initial pretrial conference and pre-motion conference. The Court directed the parties to file a proposed civil case discovery plan and scheduling order by 1/14/2022 with the following outside dates: fact discovery by 5/13/2022, expert discovery by 7/8/2022, and a case management conference to be held on 8/10/2022 at 10:30 a.m. The parties shall strike the paragraph concerning amended pleadings as no further amendments will be permitted. The Court granted the motion to be relieved as counsel filed by Maryam Jazini Dorcheh, Esq. (Doc. 77). With respect to plaintiff’s pre-motion letter, the Court construed the letter-motion (Doc. 72) as the motions for judgment on the pleadings and to strike affirmative defenses, pursuant to In re Best Payphones, Inc., 450 F. App'x 8, 15 (2d Cir. 2011) (upholding construction of pre-motion letter as motion). The Court considered the arguments therein, defendants’ response thereto (Doc. 75), and for the reasons set forth on the record and case law cited, the Court DENIED plaintiff’s motions for judgment on the pleadings and to strike affirmative defenses. See transcript. The Court discussed with the parties the possibility of resolution of the case. An Order of Reference to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for settlement will be separately docketed. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Doc. 77 and to terminate Maryam Jazini Dorcheh, Esq. as counsel of record herein.

SO ORDERED: Dated: White Plains, New York January 13, 2022

United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JANE DOE, MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, AND ORDER

-against- 20-CV-02331 (PMH) DR. MARJORIE KING, et al.,

Defendants. PHILIP M. HALPERN, United States District Judge: Counsel for plaintiff, outgoing counsel for defendants, and incoming counsel for defendants appeared today via telephone for an initial pretrial conference and pre-motion conference. The Court directed the parties to file a proposed civil case discovery plan and scheduling order by 1/14/2022 with the following outside dates: fact discovery by 5/13/2022, expert discovery by 7/8/2022, and a case management conference to be held on 8/10/2022 at 10:30 a.m. The parties shall strike the paragraph concerning amended pleadings as no further amendments will be permitted. The Court granted the motion to be relieved as counsel filed by Maryam Jazini Dorcheh, Esq. (Doc. 77). With respect to plaintiff’s pre-motion letter, the Court construed the letter-motion (Doc. 72) as the motions for judgment on the pleadings and to strike affirmative defenses, pursuant to In re Best Payphones, Inc., 450 F. App'x 8, 15 (2d Cir. 2011) (upholding construction of pre-motion letter as motion). The Court considered the arguments therein, defendants’ response thereto (Doc. 75), and for the reasons set forth on the record and case law cited, the Court DENIED plaintiff’s motions for judgment on the pleadings and to strike affirmative defenses. See transcript. The Court discussed with the parties the possibility of resolution of the case. An Order of Reference to Magistrate Judge McCarthy for settlement will be separately docketed. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Doc. 77 and to terminate Maryam Jazini Dorcheh, Esq. as counsel of record herein.

SO ORDERED: Dated: White Plains, New York January 13, 2022

United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Doe v. Helen Hayes Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-helen-hayes-hospital-nysd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack