Doe v. HCA HEALTH SERV. OF FLORIDA
This text of 640 So. 2d 1177 (Doe v. HCA HEALTH SERV. OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mary DOE, Individually, and as guardian for Jjohn Doe, A minor, Appellant,
v.
HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. d/b/a HCA L.W. Blake Memorial Hospital, John Pfeilsticker, M.D., Manatee Hospitals and Health Systems, Inc., Howard A. Goldman, M.D. and Howard A. Goldman, P.A., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Paige McMichael of Casella & McMichael, Bradenton, for appellant.
Bonita L. Kneeland of Fowler, White, Gillen, Boggs, Villareal & Banker, P.A., Tampa, for appellee HCA Health Services of Florida, Inc.
Frank Strelec and David A. Wallace of Williams, Parker, Harrison, Dietz & Getzen, Sarasota, for appellee Manatee Hospitals and Health Systems, Inc. d/b/a Manatee Memorial Hosp.
Rebecca A. Baitty and H. Roger Lutz of Lutz, Webb, Partridge, Bobo & Baitty, P.A., Sarasota, for appellee John Pfeilsticker, M.D.
George N. Meros, Jr. of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee Goldman.
THREADGILL, Judge.
Mary Doe filed a complaint against the doctors and hospitals that treated her son under the Baker Act,[1] alleging false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, negligent hiring and failure to train, assault and battery, misrepresentation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Mrs. Doe appeals a final judgment dismissing her action for failure *1178 to comply with the presuit requirements of chapter 766, Florida Statutes (1991).
We agree with the trial judge that each of the several allegations of the complaint arose out of the rendering of medical care by licensed health care providers subject to the prevailing professional standard of care,[2] and compliance with chapter 766 was required. See Weinstock v. Groth, 629 So.2d 835 (Fla. 1993); NME Properties, Inc. v. McCullough, 590 So.2d 439, 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Long v. Rothbaum, 68 Md. App. 569, 514 A.2d 1223 (1986); see also Martinez v. Lifemark Hosp. of Florida, Inc., 608 So.2d 855 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
Affirmed.
RYDER, A.C.J., and PARKER, J., concur.
NOTES
[1] §§ 394.451-394.4789, Fla. Stat. (1991).
[2] See § 766.102(1), Fla. Stat. (1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
640 So. 2d 1177, 1994 WL 380919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-hca-health-serv-of-florida-fladistctapp-1994.