Doe v. Graf
This text of Doe v. Graf (Doe v. Graf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Jane Doe, Appellant,
v.
Carol Graf, M.D., and Carol M. Graf & Associates, Respondents.
Appeal From Charleston County
Thomas L. Hughston, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion No. 2006-MO-014
Heard March 9, 2006 Filed May 1, 2006
AFFIRMED
Gregg E. Meyers, of Charleston, for Appellant.
Stephen L. Brown, Matthew Kiel Mahoney, and Carol Brittain Ervin, all of Young, Clement, Rivers, of Charleston, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR and the following authority: Brown v. Leverette, 291 S.C. 364, 353 S.E.2d 697 (1987) (Rule 12(b)(6) SCRCP motion to dismiss must be granted if facts alleged in complaint and inferences reasonably deducible therefrom do not entitle plaintiff to relief on any theory of the case).
AFFIRMED.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES, JJ., and Acting Justice Roger L. Couch, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Doe v. Graf, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-graf-sc-2006.