Doe v. Ferrell
This text of Doe v. Ferrell (Doe v. Ferrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-60338 Summary Calendar __________________
JANE DOE I,
Plaintiff-Appellant, versus
WILLIAM T. FERRELL, JR.,
Defendant-Appellee. _________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:94-CV-85 _________________________________________________________________ December 15, 1995 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The appellant appeals from the district court's order granting
the defendant's motion for summary judgment. She argues that there
remained genuine issues of material fact concerning her claims
against the defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under Mississippi
tort law. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for
essentially the reasons given by the district court. Doe v.
Ferrell, No. 5:94-CV-85 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 28, 1995).
A F F I R M E D.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Doe v. Ferrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-ferrell-ca5-1995.