Doe v. Ferrell
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-60338
Summary Calendar
JANE DOE I,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM T. FERRELL, JR.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 5:94-CV-85
December 15, 1995
Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* The appellant appeals from the district court's order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment. She argues that there remained genuine issues of material fact concerning her claims against the defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under Mississippi tort law. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons given by the district court. Doe v. Ferrell, No. 5:94-CV-85 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 28, 1995).
A F F I R M E D.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doe v. Ferrell (Doe v. Ferrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.