Doe v. Eggleston
146 A. 175, 106 N.J.L. 565, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 190
This text of 146 A. 175 (Doe v. Eggleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Doe v. Eggleston, 146 A. 175, 106 N.J.L. 565, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 190 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Teenchaed, Paekee, Kalisch, Campbell, McGlennon, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 8.
For reversal — White, Van Buskiek, Kays, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stewart v. Brock
290 P.2d 682 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1955)
Winter v. Toldt
108 A.2d 648 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Hamrick v. Cooper River Lumber Co.
74 S.E.2d 575 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
146 A. 175, 106 N.J.L. 565, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-eggleston-nj-1929.