Doe v. Doar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doe v. Doar

26 A.D.3d 787, 807 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2006 NY Slip Op 802, 2006 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1326

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 2006·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), entered August 5, 2005 in a declaratory judgment action. The judgment, among other things, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary [788]*788judgment and declared 18 NYCRR 352.2 (b) to be invalid as in conflict with Social Services Law § 131-c.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court (see also Matter of Melendez v Wing, 21 AD3d 129, 131-133 [2005]). Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), entered August 5, 2005 in a declaratory judgment action. The judgment, among other things, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary [788]*788judgment and declared 18 NYCRR 352.2 (b) to be invalid as in conflict with Social Services Law § 131-c.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court (see also Matter of Melendez v Wing, 21 AD3d 129, 131-133 [2005]). Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.

Doe v. Doar, 26 A.D.3d 787, 807 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2006 NY Slip Op 802, 2006 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

26 A.D.3d 787 (Doe v. Doar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related