Doe v. DIOCESE OF LANSING

Michigan Supreme Court

Doe v. DIOCESE OF LANSING

712 N.W.2d 729, 474 Mich. 1134

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 4, 2006

Docket130171

StatusPublished

This text of 712 N.W.2d 729 (Doe v. DIOCESE OF LANSING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe v. DIOCESE OF LANSING, 712 N.W.2d 729, 474 Mich. 1134 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

712 N.W.2d 729 (2006) 474 Mich. 1134

John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DIOCESE OF LANSING, Bishop Carl F. Mengeling, Bishop James Murray, Archdiocese of Santa Fe, Archbishop Michael Jarobe Sheehan, Robert F. Sanchez, f/k/a Archbishop Robert F. Sanchez, The Servants of the Paraclete, Archbishop of Detroit, Cardinal Adam Joseph Maida, Bishop Thomas Gumbleton, and Jason B. Sigler, f/k/a Father Jason B. Sigler, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 130171. COA No. 262274.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 4, 2006.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, WEAVER, and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI