Doe v. Department of Corrections

876 N.W.2d 570, 499 Mich. 886
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided March 30, 2016·No. Nos. 152406 and 152435·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate that part of the Court of Appeals opinion considering whether the defendants were precluded, under principles of collateral estoppel, from arguing that the 1999 amendment to the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2301(b), is constitutional and whether the 1999 amendment to the Civil Rights Act violates equal protection. In light of the Court of Appeals ruling that plaintiffs’ complaint should be dismissed under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, MCL 600.5501 et seq., it was unnecessary to resolve the remaining issues. In all other respects, the applications for leave to appeal are denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Department of Corrections, 876 N.W.2d 570, 499 Mich. 886 (Mich. 2016).

876 N.W.2d 570 (Doe v. Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nakyrra Hogan v. Wayne County
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2024
Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections
928 N.W.2d 214 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2019)
John Does 11-18 v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2017
John Does 1-7 v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016