Doe v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Supreme Court

Doe v. Department of Corrections

876 N.W.2d 570, 499 Mich. 886

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 30, 2016

DocketNos. 152406 and 152435

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 876 N.W.2d 570 (Doe v. Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe v. Department of Corrections, 876 N.W.2d 570, 499 Mich. 886 (Mich. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate that part of the Court of Appeals opinion considering whether the defendants were precluded, under principles of collateral estoppel, from arguing that the 1999 amendment to the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2301(b), is constitutional and whether the 1999 amendment to the Civil Rights Act violates equal protection. In light of the Court of Appeals ruling that plaintiffs’ complaint should be dismissed under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, MCL 600.5501 et seq., it was unnecessary to resolve the remaining issues. In all other respects, the applications for leave to appeal are denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate that part of the Court of Appeals opinion considering whether the defendants were precluded, under principles of collateral estoppel, from arguing that the 1999 amendment to the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2301(b), is constitutional and whether the 1999 amendment to the Civil Rights Act violates equal protection. In light of the Court of Appeals ruling that plaintiffs’ complaint should be dismissed under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act, MCL 600.5501 et seq., it was unnecessary to resolve the remaining issues. In all other respects, the applications for leave to appeal are denied, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

876 N.W.2d 570, 499 Mich. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-department-of-corrections-mich-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack