Doe v. Craigen
8 Va. 449
Opinions
In spite of the ingenious argument of the counsel for the plaintiff in error, I am of opinion, that according to the spirit and meaning of the law, and the clear and uniform course of our decisions, the estate given to Phoebe Couchman was a fee tail, changed by our act into a fee simple, and the devise over void.
I think the case a very plain one, and that the judgment ought to be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doe v. Craigen, 8 Va. 449 (Va. 1836).
8 Va. 449 (Doe v. Craigen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jiggetts v. Davis
1 Va. 368 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1829)
Ball v. Payne
27 Va. 73 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1827)