Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Doe v. Christoforo

Doe v. Christoforo

871 A.2d 1027, 273 Conn. 920, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 132
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 31, 2005
DocketSC 17400
StatusPublished

This text of 871 A.2d 1027 (Doe v. Christoforo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe v. Christoforo, 871 A.2d 1027, 273 Conn. 920, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 132 (Colo. 2005).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn. App. 359 (AC 23908), is granted, limited to the following issue:

[921]*921The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17400. William F. Gallagher and Da,vid McCarry, in support of the petition. Eric J. Stockman and Maureen Sullivan Dinnan, in opposition. Decided March 31, 2005

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court properly excluded the defendant’s statement from evidence?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. Christoforo
865 A.2d 444 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
871 A.2d 1027, 273 Conn. 920, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-christoforo-conn-2005.