Doe on the demise of Pilkington v. Lutterloh

3 N.C. 220
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 15, 1802
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 220 (Doe on the demise of Pilkington v. Lutterloh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe on the demise of Pilkington v. Lutterloh, 3 N.C. 220 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

Opinion

TVAIX, Judge.

If the ouster be laid before the demise, the jury on the trial shall take notice thereof, and give their verdict accordingly. If there be no ouster, there can be no damages, for it; consequently, they must be satisfied that it was. cora-znitted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-on-the-demise-of-pilkington-v-lutterloh-ncsuperct-1802.