Doe on Dem. of Kerr v. Elliott

61 N.C. 601
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 61 N.C. 601 (Doe on Dem. of Kerr v. Elliott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe on Dem. of Kerr v. Elliott, 61 N.C. 601 (N.C. 1868).

Opinion

Pearson, C. J.

The survey shows that the cleared ground as indicated by “the dots” was north and inside of the line of the defendant D S E and that the defendant, as soon as he purchased, in December 1848, took possession immediately north of the cleared ground, and this possession, according to the evidence, was continued and extended from time to time, north to the line N O. .

So the defendant ever since December 1848 has had a possession inside of the lappage which exposed him to an action; and consequently ripened his title after seven years adverse possession under the deed. The fact that he from time to time extended his possession, that is took in more land, does not at all affect the question; and the matter is too plain to admit of discussion.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berry v. . Coppersmith
193 S.E. 3 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
McQueen v. . Graham
111 S.E. 860 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Currie v. . Gilchrist
61 S.E. 581 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 N.C. 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-on-dem-of-kerr-v-elliott-nc-1868.