Doe MC-1 v. The University of Michigan

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan
DecidedSeptember 16, 2022
Docket2:20-cv-10568
StatusUnknown

This text of Doe MC-1 v. The University of Michigan (Doe MC-1 v. The University of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Doe MC-1 v. The University of Michigan, (E.D. Mich. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

John Doe MC-1, Case No. 2:20-cv-10568-VAR-EAS Plaintiff, Hon. Victoria A. Roberts v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford

The University of Michigan, the Regents of The University of Michigan, Master Case Filing Defendants.

ORDER: (1) GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO ESTABLISH THE UM SURVIVORS’ QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT FUND AND TO APPOINT QSF CO-ADMINISTRATORS; AND (2) ESTABLISHING THE UM SURVIVORS’ QUALIFIED SETTLEMENT FUND AND TO APPOINT QSF CO-ADMINISTRATORS The Plaintiffs’ Co-Leadership Counsel, on behalf of Settlement Claimants, petitioned the Court to establish the UM Survivors’ Qualified Settlement Fund and to appoint ARCHER Systems LLC as Fund Administrator and ARX Management, LLC as Investment Advisor. The Court considered Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion and all other matters of record. The Court finds good cause to grant the motion and ORDERS: 1. UM2022 Qualified Settlement Fund is established as a Qualified Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1 and pursuant to the jurisdiction conferred on this Court by Treas. Reg. § 1.468B-1(c)(1). 3. ARCHER Systems, LLC, 1775 Saint James Place, Suite 200, Houston, TX 77056 is appointed as the “Fund Administrator” of the Fund (as a “qualified

settlement fund”) within the meaning of section 1.468B-2(k)(3) of the Regulations (“Administrator”) responsible for administering the Fund. 4. ARX Management, LLC, 1730 E. Holly Ave #795, El Segundo, CA

90245 is appointed as the Investment Advisor of the Fund (as a “qualified settlement fund”) within the meaning of section 1.468B-2(k)(3) of the Regulations (“Administrator”) responsible for administering the Fund. 5. ARCHER and ARX collectively are appointed as QSF Co-

Administrators of the Fund. 6. The Fund must be treated at all times as a “qualified settlement fund” within the meaning of §468B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and Treas. Reg.

§§ 1.468B-1 through 1.468B-5, 26 C.F.R. §§ 1.468B-1 through 1.468B-5 (1992) and be administered in accordance with the requirements of those Treasury Regulations. The parties must treat the Fund as a qualified settlement fund for all reporting purposes under the federal tax laws. It is the responsibility of the QSF

Co-Administrators to prepare and deliver any necessary documentation for signature by all necessary parties, and to cause the appropriate filing to occur. All expenses associated with compliance with this provision must be paid from the

Fund. The QSF Co-Administrators will be the “administrator” within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.468B-2(k)(3). Consequently, the responsibility for the filing of all informational and other tax returns necessary or advisable with respect

to the Fund (including without limitation the returns described in Treas. Reg. § 1.468B-2(k)) is the QSF Co-Administrators’. Such returns must reflect that all taxes (including any estimated taxes, interest, or penalties) on the income earned on the

Fund must be paid out of the Fund. 7. The Fund is immediately authorized to receive the payment of the Immediately Allocable Amount1 from Defendants, and to hold that sum, subject to the continuing jurisdiction of this Court, until the QSF Co-Administrators are

provided approved disbursement instructions in accordance with this Order. 8. Effective upon the deposit of the Immediately Allocable Amount into the Fund, all Released Claims (as defined in the Settlement Releases) by or on behalf

of each Plaintiff Releasing Person must be fully and finally released and extinguished in accordance with the Settlement Releases executed by each Plaintiff Releasing Person, and any and all liability of the UM Released Persons with respect

to the Released Claims of each Plaintiff Releasing Person must be fully and finally released and extinguished. In addition, upon the deposit of the Immediately Allocable Amount into the Fund, neither UM Defendants nor any of the UM

1 Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms have the meaning ascribed to them in the parties’ May 19, 2022 Private Master Settlement Agreement. Released Persons will have any responsibility for the management, investment, disbursement, treatment, administration, or other handling of the Immediately

Allocable Amount or its proceeds, or any liability arising from or relating in any way to the investment, management, disbursement, treatment, administration, or other handling of the Fund. Without in any way limiting the foregoing, upon the deposit

of the Immediately Allocable Amount into the Fund, the UM Defendants and the UM Released Persons will be fully and completely released with respect to all matters arising after such deposit with respect to the Released Claims and the Immediately Allocable Amount (or the proceeds thereof), including but not limited

to, the management, investment, disbursement, treatment, administration, or other handling of the Immediately Allocable Amount or its proceeds. 9. The Fund is authorized to effect qualified or non-qualified assignments

of any resulting structured settlement liability or deferred compensation agreement as directed in writing by Claimants or Plaintiffs’ Counsel. 10. The QSF Co-Administrators are authorized to distribute all funds, including attorney fees and litigation expenses to counsel for Claimants along with

their co-counsel, consistent with their existing contingency fee contracts including the use of structured attorney fees. 11. The QSF Co-Administrators, upon completion and final distribution of

all monies paid into the Fund, are authorized to take appropriate steps to wind down the fund and thereafter discharge the QSF Co-Administrators from any further responsibility with respect to the Fund. The QSF Co-Administrators may, but are

not obligated to, seek a final order of discharge from this Court. 12. No bond shall be required, provided that all monies received by the Fund, which include all principal and interest earned thereon, shall be deposited in

a custody account held at U.S. Bank (the “Custody Bank”), a financial institution doing business in Minneapolis, MN, for the benefit of and titled in the legal name of the Settlement Fund and invested in instruments/securities comprised of (a) any obligations of, or any obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest, by the

United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof; (b) cash equivalent securities including SEC registered money market funds and collateralized money market accounts; (c) short-term investment-grade securities;

and/or (d) deposit and similar interest-bearing, or non-interest bearing accounts, and certificates of deposit subject to Federal Depository Insurance Corporation protections as available, which may be held within the custody account or at the issuer bank. The Custody Bank shall follow the instructions of the Investment

Advisor, pursuant to these terms and conditions, such that a safety of principal investment policy is implemented. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Custody Bank shall not be allowed to distribute any income or principal from the Settlement Fund

except upon instructions of the Investment Advisor, or, if requested, upon the order of this Court upon the joint motion of the parties. The Investment Advisor retains the right to remove the Custody Bank, and may designate a replacement bank, upon

the written consent of Plaintiffs' Counsel. In the event of such replacement, the terms and conditions of this Paragraph - including, without limitation, those addressing bond requirements, investments, and distributions from the Settlement Fund-shall

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Childs v. Commissioner
103 T.C. No. 36 (U.S. Tax Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Doe MC-1 v. The University of Michigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-mc-1-v-the-university-of-michigan-mied-2022.