Home/Ninth Circuit/Doe I v. Unocal Corp.

Doe I v. Unocal Corp.

403 F.3d 708, 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 671, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6070
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2005·No. Nos. 00-56603, 00-57197, 00-56628, 00-57195·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The parties’ stipulated motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The appeals (00-56603, 00-56628, 00-57195, and 00-57197) are dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs.

The Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Vacate District Court Opinion, a motion in which Appellees join, is GRANTED. The district court opinion in Doe v. Unocal Corp., 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D.Cal.2000), is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe I v. Unocal Corp., 403 F.3d 708, 161 Oil & Gas Rep. 671, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 6070 (9th Cir. 2005).

403 F.3d 708 (Doe I v. Unocal Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ABECASSIS v. Wyatt
704 F. Supp. 2d 623 (S.D. Texas, 2010)
John Doe I, Individually & as Administrator of the Estate of His Deceased Child Baby Doe I, & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated Jane Doe, I, on Behalf of Herself, as Administratrix of the Estate of Her Deceased Child Baby Doe I, & on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated John Doe II John Doe III John Doe IV John Doe v. Jane Doe II Jane Doe III John Doe Vi John Doe Vii John Doe Viii John Doe Ix John Doe X John Doe Xi, on Behalf of Themselves & All Others Similarly Situated & Louisa Benson on Behalf of Herself & the General Public v. Unocal Corporation, a California Corporation Total S.A., a Foreign Corporation John Imle, an Individual Roger C. Beach, an Individual, John Roe III John Roe Vii John Roe Viii John Roe X v. Unocal Corporation Union Oil Company of California
403 F.3d 708 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)