Doe ex dem. Smith v. Grady

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Doe ex dem. Smith v. Grady

13 N.C. 395

DecidedJune 15, 1830

StatusPublished

This text of 13 N.C. 395 (Doe ex dem. Smith v. Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe ex dem. Smith v. Grady, 13 N.C. 395 (N.C. 1830).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Judge,

after stating the material parts of the deed, as above set forth, proceeded: It is true, there is no consideration expressed as between the grantor and John, yet there was one before that time expressed between the grantor and Alexander; and a consideration of natural affection, expressed to one child, will by con-' struction of law be extended to others. (7 Gwil. Bac. Abr. 97.) Therefore in this case it must be taken that John T. Grady has a life estate in the premises in question.

Per Curiam. — -Let the judgment of the Court helots be affirmed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Judge,

after stating the material parts of the deed, as above set forth, proceeded: It is true, there is no consideration expressed as between the grantor and John, yet there was one before that time expressed between the grantor and Alexander; and a consideration of natural affection, expressed to one child, will by con-' struction of law be extended to others. (7 Gwil. Bac. Abr. 97.) Therefore in this case it must be taken that John T. Grady has a life estate in the premises in question.

Per Curiam. — -Let the judgment of the Court helots be affirmed.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.C. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-ex-dem-smith-v-grady-nc-1830.