Doe Ex Dem . Kincaid v. . Perkins

63 N.C. 282
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1869·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rodman, J.

The deed from John Kincaid, and Polly, Ms-wife, although inoperative as to her, from want of private-examination, yet passed the estate of the husband. He was-entitled to an estate as tenant by the curtesy, and the possession of the defendant did not become adverse until his death in 1867, from which time only, the statute of limitation, began to run. Davenport v. Wynne, 6 Ire. 128.

There is no error in the judgment, and it must be affirmed..

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe Ex Dem . Kincaid v. . Perkins, 63 N.C. 282 (N.C. 1869).

63 N.C. 282 (Doe Ex Dem . Kincaid v. . Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roebke v. Andrews
26 Wis. 311 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1870)