Doe Ex Dem . Kincaid v. . Perkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Doe Ex Dem . Kincaid v. . Perkins

63 N.C. 282

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 5, 1869

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 63 N.C. 282 (Doe Ex Dem . Kincaid v. . Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe Ex Dem . Kincaid v. . Perkins, 63 N.C. 282 (N.C. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Rodman, J.

The deed from John Kincaid, and Polly, Ms-wife, although inoperative as to her, from want of private-examination, yet passed the estate of the husband. He was-entitled to an estate as tenant by the curtesy, and the possession of the defendant did not become adverse until his death in 1867, from which time only, the statute of limitation, began to run. Davenport v. Wynne, 6 Ire. 128.

There is no error in the judgment, and it must be affirmed..

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodman, J.

The deed from John Kincaid, and Polly, Ms-wife, although inoperative as to her, from want of private-examination, yet passed the estate of the husband. He was-entitled to an estate as tenant by the curtesy, and the possession of the defendant did not become adverse until his death in 1867, from which time only, the statute of limitation, began to run. Davenport v. Wynne, 6 Ire. 128.

There is no error in the judgment, and it must be affirmed..

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 N.C. 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-ex-dem-kincaid-v-perkins-nc-1869.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack