Doe ex dem. Hanby v. Roe

Supreme Court of Georgia

Doe ex dem. Hanby v. Roe

28 Ga. 484

DecidedJune 15, 1859

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Ga. 484 (Doe ex dem. Hanby v. Roe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe ex dem. Hanby v. Roe, 28 Ga. 484 (Ga. 1859).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

We think the verdict contrary to the weight of evidence in this case; but not so strongly and decidedly so as to authorize a new trial, especially when it has been refused by the circuit judge who presided on the trial of the cause.

We rather think this lot of land has been made without being paid for. Still there is a conflict of testimony; and the jury were probably the best judges as to the facts.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Lumpkin, J.,

delivering the opinion.

We think the verdict contrary to the weight of evidence in this case; but not so strongly and decidedly so as to authorize a new trial, especially when it has been refused by the circuit judge who presided on the trial of the cause.

We rather think this lot of land has been made without being paid for. Still there is a conflict of testimony; and the jury were probably the best judges as to the facts.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Ga. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-ex-dem-hanby-v-roe-ga-1859.