Doe Ex Dem. Arrington v. Sledge

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Doe Ex Dem. Arrington v. Sledge

13 N.C. 359

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 5, 1830

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 13 N.C. 359 (Doe Ex Dem. Arrington v. Sledge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doe Ex Dem. Arrington v. Sledge, 13 N.C. 359 (N.C. 1830).

Pincite

Opinion

Ruffin, Judge.

The principle laid down by the Court below, is a very old one. It is considéred as thoroughly settled, that, as against the Defendant in the execution, and all claiming by his alienation, a fieri fa-cias binds from its teste. Without entering at large into the subject, it will be sufficient to refer to what was said by me on this point, in Palmer & Co. v. Clarke (ante, p. 356). Numerous cases also support the opinion, as to the relation of an alias duly issued.

Per Curiam. — Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ruffin, Judge.

The principle laid down by the Court below, is a very old one. It is considéred as thoroughly settled, that, as against the Defendant in the execution, and all claiming by his alienation, a fieri fa-cias binds from its teste. Without entering at large into the subject, it will be sufficient to refer to what was said by me on this point, in Palmer & Co. v. Clarke (ante, p. 356). Numerous cases also support the opinion, as to the relation of an alias duly issued.

Per Curiam. — Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 N.C. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-ex-dem-arrington-v-sledge-nc-1830.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack