Doe Ex Dem. Arrington v. Sledge

13 N.C. 359
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1830·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Ruffin, Judge.

The principle laid down by the Court below, is a very old one. It is considéred as thoroughly settled, that, as against the Defendant in the execution, and all claiming by his alienation, a fieri fa-cias binds from its teste. Without entering at large into the subject, it will be sufficient to refer to what was said by me on this point, in Palmer & Co. v. Clarke (ante, p. 356). Numerous cases also support the opinion, as to the relation of an alias duly issued.

Per Curiam. — Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe Ex Dem. Arrington v. Sledge, 13 N.C. 359 (N.C. 1830).

13 N.C. 359 (Doe Ex Dem. Arrington v. Sledge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

George W. Cable Co. v. Israel
177 Iowa 579 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1916)