Dodwell & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dodwell & Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 445

United States Customs Court·Decided May 24, 1956·No. No. 59951; protest 224598-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

[446]*446Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The documents received in evidence established that the merchandise in question came from Macau, or Macao, which is a part of China that is under the domination or control of the Republic of Portugal, and that Portuguese domination or control is not Communist domination or control. Accordingly, it was held that the merchandise is not excluded by the Presidential proclamation, T. D. 52788, from trade agreement reductions in duty rates, and the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[446]*446Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The documents received in evidence established that the merchandise in question came from Macau, or Macao, which is a part of China that is under the domination or control of the Republic of Portugal, and that Portuguese domination or control is not Communist domination or control. Accordingly, it was held that the merchandise is not excluded by the Presidential proclamation, T. D. 52788, from trade agreement reductions in duty rates, and the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Dodwell & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 445 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 445 (Dodwell & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.