Dodwell & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dodwell & Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 445

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 24, 1956

DocketNo. 59951; protest 224598-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 445 (Dodwell & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dodwell & Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 445 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

[446]*446Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The documents received in evidence established that the merchandise in question came from Macau, or Macao, which is a part of China that is under the domination or control of the Republic of Portugal, and that Portuguese domination or control is not Communist domination or control. Accordingly, it was held that the merchandise is not excluded by the Presidential proclamation, T. D. 52788, from trade agreement reductions in duty rates, and the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[446]*446Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The documents received in evidence established that the merchandise in question came from Macau, or Macao, which is a part of China that is under the domination or control of the Republic of Portugal, and that Portuguese domination or control is not Communist domination or control. Accordingly, it was held that the merchandise is not excluded by the Presidential proclamation, T. D. 52788, from trade agreement reductions in duty rates, and the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 Cust. Ct. 445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodwell-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.