Dodson v. VON HOFFMAN PRESS, INC.
This text of 342 S.W.3d 343 (Dodson v. VON HOFFMAN PRESS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Jason Dodson appeals from a decision issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying his claims for workers’ compensation benefits for injuries he claimed to have suffered to his neck as a result of occupational disease and a subsequent traumatic injury. In denying his claims, the Commission determined that Dodson’s injuries did not arise out of or in the course of his employment with Von Hoffman Press, Inc. *344 After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the Commission’s order is supported by sufficient competent evidence in the record, that the Commission acted within its powers, that the decision was not procured by fraud, and that the facts found by the Commission support the award. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
342 S.W.3d 343, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 697, 2011 WL 1988441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodson-v-von-hoffman-press-inc-moctapp-2011.