Dodson v. State

261 A.2d 38, 8 Md. App. 478, 1970 Md. App. LEXIS 372
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland·Decided January 23, 1970·No. 240, September Term, 1969·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Following his indictment in Montgomery County for housebreaking and related offenses, the appellant filed a motion for discovery and inspection under Maryland Rule 728 to require the State’s Attorney to provide him with a list of any books, papers, documents, or tangible objects obtained from or belonging to him or obtained from others by seizure or by process. The State, in answer to appellant’s motion, declined to provide such a list, but stated that defense counsel could inspect all such physical evidence by contacting designated police officers. The appellant excepted to the sufficiency of the State’s answer, a hearing was held, and the court overruled appellant’s exceptions. He then appealed to this court from that order. The State moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it was taken from a pretrial interlocutory order and, hence, was not immediately appealable, a position with which we agree for reasons set forth in detail in Raimondi v. State, 8 Md. App. 468 (1970).

Appeal dismissed; costs to be paid by appellant; the mandate of this court to issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodson v. State, 261 A.2d 38, 8 Md. App. 478, 1970 Md. App. LEXIS 372 (Md. Ct. App. 1970).

261 A.2d 38 (Dodson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neal v. State
314 A.2d 710 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
State v. Lohss
313 A.2d 87 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1973)
McChan v. State
264 A.2d 130 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1970)
Raimondi v. State
261 A.2d 40 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1970)