Dodson v. Smith & Core, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Dodson v. Smith & Core, Inc.

797 So. 2d 56, 2001 La. LEXIS 2696, 2001 WL 1130915

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 21, 2001·No. No. 2001-C-1585·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Dodson, Vanessa et al.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 98-14745; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2000 CA 0838.

Judgment of the court of appeal affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is hereby reversed. There are genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is denied, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant and docket. VICTORY, J., would deny the writ. TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Dodson, Vanessa et al.; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. F, No. 98-14745; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2000 CA 0838.

Judgment of the court of appeal affirming the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is hereby reversed. There are genuine issues of material fact precluding summary judgment. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is denied, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., would grant and docket. VICTORY, J., would deny the writ. TRAYLOR, J., would deny the writ.

Dodson v. Smith & Core, Inc., 797 So. 2d 56, 2001 La. LEXIS 2696, 2001 WL 1130915 (La. 2001).

Pincite

797 So. 2d 56 (Dodson v. Smith & Core, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related