Dodson v. Corporation Commission

1933 OK 455, 25 P.2d 638, 165 Okla. 210, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 297
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided September 12, 1933·No. 24131·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BUSBY, J.

This is a companion case to cause No. 24132, Oils Incorporated v. Corporation Commission et al., this date decided. (165 Okla. 202, 25 P. (2d) 703.) The same property is involved as well as the ame period of production. The cases differ only in that the plaintiffs in error in this case are owners of fractional interests in and to the % working interest covered by the lease of the producing property involved, whereas, in cause No. 24132 the plaintiff in error was the operator. The legal questions involved which are material to a determination of the issues are identical. The causes have been considered together in this court, and the ultimate rights of the parties in this case have been determined in accordance with the views expressed in the opinion in cause No. 24132.

The opinion in cause No. 24132 is therefore adopted as the opinion in this case, and this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to proceed in a manner not inconsistent with the views announced.

RILEY, C. J., OÜLLISON, V. C. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, OSBORN, BAYLESS, and WELCH, JL, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodson v. Corporation Commission, 1933 OK 455, 25 P.2d 638, 165 Okla. 210, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 297 (Okla. 1933).

1933 OK 455 (Dodson v. Corporation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Decker v. Ponca City
1961 OK 79 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1961)
Riedt v. City of McAlester
1953 OK 286 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1953)
Baldwin v. City of Lawton
1947 OK 121 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1947)