Dodson v. Bledsoe

Fourth Circuit

Dodson v. Bledsoe

189 F. App'x 290

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2006·No. No. 06-6781·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Douglas J. Dodson, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dodson v. Bledsoe, No. 7:06-cv-00067-sgw (WD.Va. Jan. 26, 2006, and Feb. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Douglas J. Dodson, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Dodson v. Bledsoe, No. 7:06-cv-00067-sgw (WD.Va. Jan. 26, 2006, and Feb. 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Dodson v. Bledsoe, 189 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

189 F. App'x 290 (Dodson v. Bledsoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related