Dodson v. Bade
This text of 535 P.2d 1051 (Dodson v. Bade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this matter, the Court of Appeals in an unpublished memorandum decision on June 6, 1974, held, for the reasons stated in the court’s opinion Hillock v. Bade, 22 Ariz.App. 46, 523 P.2d 97 (1974), that the action of the Pima County Assessor pursuant to a county, three-year, cyclical reevaluation plan was constitutional under Article 9, § 1, of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S. We accepted review to examine into the question.
Our conclusions are in accord with those expressed by the Court of Appeals.
The memorandum decision is approved and judgment is ordered in favor of appellees, cross-appellants as directed therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
535 P.2d 1051, 111 Ariz. 578, 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodson-v-bade-ariz-1975.