Dodson v. Bade

Arizona Supreme Court

Dodson v. Bade

535 P.2d 1051, 111 Ariz. 578, 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 287

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided June 2, 1975·No. No. 11666-PR·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, the Court of Appeals in an unpublished memorandum decision on June 6, 1974, held, for the reasons stated in the court’s opinion Hillock v. Bade, 22 Ariz.App. 46, 523 P.2d 97 (1974), that the action of the Pima County Assessor pursuant to a county, three-year, cyclical reevaluation plan was constitutional under Article 9, § 1, of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S. We accepted review to examine into the question.

Our conclusions are in accord with those expressed by the Court of Appeals.

The memorandum decision is approved and judgment is ordered in favor of appellees, cross-appellants as directed therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this matter, the Court of Appeals in an unpublished memorandum decision on June 6, 1974, held, for the reasons stated in the court’s opinion Hillock v. Bade, 22 Ariz.App. 46, 523 P.2d 97 (1974), that the action of the Pima County Assessor pursuant to a county, three-year, cyclical reevaluation plan was constitutional under Article 9, § 1, of the Arizona Constitution, A.R.S. We accepted review to examine into the question.

Our conclusions are in accord with those expressed by the Court of Appeals.

The memorandum decision is approved and judgment is ordered in favor of appellees, cross-appellants as directed therein.

Dodson v. Bade, 535 P.2d 1051, 111 Ariz. 578, 1975 Ariz. LEXIS 287 (Ark. 1975).

Pincite

535 P.2d 1051 (Dodson v. Bade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related