Dodo International Inc v. Parker

Opinion

THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 DODO INTERNATIONAL, INC, CASE NO. C20-1116-JCC 10 Plaintiff, MINUTE ORDER 11 v. 12 RICHARD PARKER, et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. 16 Coughenour, United States District Judge: 17 In light of the uncertainty about the Court’s jurisdiction, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to 18 renote Plaintiffs’ motions to permit alternative methods of service (Dkt. Nos. 24–29) for 19 consideration on January 13, 2021. See Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 94 20 (1998) (“Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause.”) (quoting Ex parte 21 McCardle, 7 Wall. 506, 514 (1868)). 22 DATED this 4th day of January 2021. 23 William M. McCool Clerk of Court 24 25 s/Paula McNabb Deputy Clerk 26