Dodi Joseph Carpenter v. The State of Wyoming

2021 WY 58, 484 P.3d 1278
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 2021
DocketS-20-0218
StatusPublished

This text of 2021 WY 58 (Dodi Joseph Carpenter v. The State of Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodi Joseph Carpenter v. The State of Wyoming, 2021 WY 58, 484 P.3d 1278 (Wyo. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING

2021 WY 58

April Term, A.D. 2021

April 28, 2021

DODI JOSEPH CARPENTER,

Appellant (Defendant),

v. S-20-0218

THE STATE OF WYOMING,

Appellee (Plaintiff).

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT’S JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE [¶ 1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following the filing of Appellant’s “Pro-se Motion for Appeal Due to Ineffective Counsel,” which was filed herein April 16, 2021. Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant entered an unconditional guilty plea to one count of sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2- 314(a)(iii). The district court imposed a 35 to 50-year sentence. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court’s September 8, 2020, “Judgment and Sentence.”

[¶ 2] On December 1, 2020, Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). This Court subsequently ordered that Appellant may “file with this Court a pro se brief specifying the issues he would like the Court to consider in this appeal.” This Court also provided notice that, after the time for filing a pro se brief expired, this Court would “make its ruling on counsel’s motion to withdraw and, if appropriate, make a final decision” on this appeal. On April 16, 2021, Appellant filed a pro se brief, which he styled as a “Pro-se Motion for Appeal Due to Ineffective Counsel.”

[¶ 3] Now, following a careful review of that pro se brief, the record, and the “Anders brief” submitted by appellate counsel, this Court finds that appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw should be granted and the district court’s “Judgment and Sentence” should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶ 4] ORDERED that the Wyoming Public Defender’s Office, court-appointed counsel for Appellant Dodi Joseph Carpenter, is hereby permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Appellant; and it is further

[¶ 5] ORDERED that the Fremont County District Court’s September 8, 2020, “Judgment and Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶ 6] DATED this 28th day of April, 2021.

BY THE COURT:

/s/

MICHAEL K. DAVIS Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 WY 58, 484 P.3d 1278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodi-joseph-carpenter-v-the-state-of-wyoming-wyo-2021.