Dodgen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dodgen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

227 S.E.2d 64, 138 Ga. App. 499, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2208

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 5, 1976

Docket51917

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 227 S.E.2d 64 (Dodgen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dodgen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance, 227 S.E.2d 64, 138 Ga. App. 499, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2208 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Quillian, Judge.

This appeal in a workmen’s compensation case arises out of the affirmance by the superior court of the full [500]*500board’s decision. During the hearing to modify an agreement as to weekly wages and weekly compensation it developed that through error the appellees (employer and insurer) had overpaid the appellant (claimant). The administrative law judge directed that the employer "recommence compensation as of date of last payment at the rate of $35.75 per week and to continue for a period not to exceed 400 weeks or until claimant undergoes a change in condition. The full board adopted the award of the administrative law judge and "further authorizes the employer/insurer to take credit against future payments for the overpayment.” Held:

Submitted March 2, 1976 Decided April 5, 1976 Rehearing denied April 29, 1976. Jack Dorsey, for appellant. Saveli, Williams, Cox & Angel, Elmer L. Nash, for appellees.

[500]*500Code § 114-415 provides: "Any payments made by the employer to the injured employee during the period of his disability, or to his dependents, which by the terms of this Title were not due and payable when made, may, subject to the approval of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation, be deducted from the amount to be paid as compensation: Provided, that in the case of disability such deductions shall be made by shortening the period during which compensation must be paid and not by reducing the amount of the weekly payments.”

The appellant contends: "It was harmful error for the Board to authorize appellees to take credit against future payments for the overpayment and not directing that such deductions shall be made by shortening the period during which compensation must be paid and not by reducing the amount of the weekly payments.” We agree. Therefore, this case is reversed with direction that the trial court remand the case to the full board to take action (within their discretion, Davis v. Cobb County, 106 Ga. App. 336, 339 (126 SE2d 710)), in compliance with the provisions of Code § 114-415 and any other applicable law.

Judgment reversed with direction.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quillian, Judge.

This appeal in a workmen’s compensation case arises out of the affirmance by the superior court of the full [500]*500board’s decision. During the hearing to modify an agreement as to weekly wages and weekly compensation it developed that through error the appellees (employer and insurer) had overpaid the appellant (claimant). The administrative law judge directed that the employer "recommence compensation as of date of last payment at the rate of $35.75 per week and to continue for a period not to exceed 400 weeks or until claimant undergoes a change in condition. The full board adopted the award of the administrative law judge and "further authorizes the employer/insurer to take credit against future payments for the overpayment.” Held:

Submitted March 2, 1976 Decided April 5, 1976 Rehearing denied April 29, 1976. Jack Dorsey, for appellant. Saveli, Williams, Cox & Angel, Elmer L. Nash, for appellees.

[500]*500Code § 114-415 provides: "Any payments made by the employer to the injured employee during the period of his disability, or to his dependents, which by the terms of this Title were not due and payable when made, may, subject to the approval of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation, be deducted from the amount to be paid as compensation: Provided, that in the case of disability such deductions shall be made by shortening the period during which compensation must be paid and not by reducing the amount of the weekly payments.”

The appellant contends: "It was harmful error for the Board to authorize appellees to take credit against future payments for the overpayment and not directing that such deductions shall be made by shortening the period during which compensation must be paid and not by reducing the amount of the weekly payments.” We agree. Therefore, this case is reversed with direction that the trial court remand the case to the full board to take action (within their discretion, Davis v. Cobb County, 106 Ga. App. 336, 339 (126 SE2d 710)), in compliance with the provisions of Code § 114-415 and any other applicable law.

Judgment reversed with direction.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 S.E.2d 64, 138 Ga. App. 499, 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 2208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodgen-v-st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-gactapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack