Dodge v. South Royalton Graded School District

Supreme Court of Vermont

Dodge v. South Royalton Graded School District

67 Vt. 334

DecidedJanuary 15, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 67 Vt. 334 (Dodge v. South Royalton Graded School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dodge v. South Royalton Graded School District, 67 Vt. 334 (Vt. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

In 1847, the plaintiff’s farm in School District 4 in Royalton, by proper proceedings, was set to School District 16 in Tunbridge, and continued a part thereof until that district was abolished April 1, 1893, by St. 1892, No. 20.

In March, 1893, School District 4 in Royalton became a part of the defendant district, but the plaintiff’s farm was not thereby annexed to defendant, for it was then a part of district 16, and when that district was abolished it became, and still is, a part of the town school district of Royalton.

Judgment affirmed without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THOMPSON, J.

In 1847, the plaintiff’s farm in School District 4 in Royalton, by proper proceedings, was set to School District 16 in Tunbridge, and continued a part thereof until that district was abolished April 1, 1893, by St. 1892, No. 20.

In March, 1893, School District 4 in Royalton became a part of the defendant district, but the plaintiff’s farm was not thereby annexed to defendant, for it was then a part of district 16, and when that district was abolished it became, and still is, a part of the town school district of Royalton.

Judgment affirmed without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 Vt. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodge-v-south-royalton-graded-school-district-vt-1895.