Dodge v. Qualtek Wireless LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 18, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-00043·Unknown

Opinion

JOSHUA DODGE, individually and for No. 2:25-cv-00043-DAD-AC others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE FILING OF v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING QUALTEK WIRELESS LLC, (Doc. No. 9) Defendant.

In connection with plaintiff’s motion for conditional certification of a Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) collective action filed on January 29, 2025, the parties are directed to file supplemental briefing addressing the following issues: 1. On July 1, 2025, the Ninth Circuit found that “where the basis for personal jurisdiction in the [FLSA] collective action is specific personal jurisdiction, the district court must assess whether each opt-in plaintiff’s claim bears a sufficient connection to the defendant’s activities in the forum state.” Harrington v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., 142 F.4th 678, 682 (9th Cir. 2025). In granular terms, how should the court apply the Ninth Circuit’s directive in this regard to the instant action? ///// 2. In addition, plaintiff is directed to respond to the argument advanced in defendant’s notice of supplemental authority that “under Harrington, Dodge’s motion for conditional certification should be denied or at least limited to only QualTek employees in California.” (Doc. No. 28 at 3.) The parties shall file their briefs addressing these issues within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. * | Dated: August 15,2025 Dal A. 2, sxe UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodge v. Qualtek Wireless LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Dodge v. Qualtek Wireless LLC (Dodge v. Qualtek Wireless LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related