Dodge v. Ockerhausen

22 N.Y.S. 25, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 196
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 13, 1893
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 N.Y.S. 25 (Dodge v. Ockerhausen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodge v. Ockerhausen, 22 N.Y.S. 25, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 196 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

PRATT, J.

The note of $1,019, in renewal of which the notes in suit were given, was executed for a good consideration. If, at the time it was made, any counterclaim existed against the payee, in favor of the maker, it did not attach to the note. That passed to the indorsees free from any set-off. If Keely & Son had a cause of action against plaintiff for delay in delivering the lumber, they have it yet. There is no evidence that it has been transferred by them to this defendant. The court below correctly held that there was no question for the jury. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Binghamton Trust Co. v. Clark
32 A.D. 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 N.Y.S. 25, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodge-v-ockerhausen-nysupct-1893.