Home/Supreme Court/Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co.

Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co.

169 U.S. 738, 42 L. Ed. 1217, 18 S. Ct. 941, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 2379
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 28, 1898
Docket602
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 U.S. 738 (Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co., 169 U.S. 738, 42 L. Ed. 1217, 18 S. Ct. 941, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 2379 (1898).

Opinion

169 U.S. 738

18 S.Ct. 941

42 L.Ed. 1217

DODGE et al.
v.
MENASHA WOOD SPLIT-PULLEY CO. et al.

No. 602.

March 28, 1898.

Lysander Hill, for petitioners.

William F. Vilas, for respondents.

Edward Rector filed brief in opposition to petition by leave of court.

No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit denied. See 30 C. C. A. 455, 86 Fed. 904.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Smoot
152 F.2d 667 (D.C. Circuit, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 U.S. 738, 42 L. Ed. 1217, 18 S. Ct. 941, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 2379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodge-v-menasha-wood-split-pulley-co-scotus-1898.