Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co.
169 U.S. 738, 42 L. Ed. 1217, 18 S. Ct. 941, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 2379
Opinion
169 U.S. 738
18 S.Ct. 941
42 L.Ed. 1217
DODGE et al.
v.
MENASHA WOOD SPLIT-PULLEY CO. et al.
No. 602.
March 28, 1898.
Lysander Hill, for petitioners.
William F. Vilas, for respondents.
Edward Rector filed brief in opposition to petition by leave of court.
No opinion. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States circuit court of appeals for the Seventh circuit denied. See 30 C. C. A. 455, 86 Fed. 904.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co., 169 U.S. 738, 42 L. Ed. 1217, 18 S. Ct. 941, 1898 U.S. LEXIS 2379 (1898).
169 U.S. 738 (Dodge v. Menasha Wood Split-Pulley Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. Smoot
152 F.2d 667 (D.C. Circuit, 1945)