Dodge v. Kaufman

46 Misc. 248, 91 N.Y.S. 727
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

MacLean, J.

Cancellation was sought and denied in the ■ court below of a judgment obtained by the plaintiffs-respondents. against the defendant-appellant and one Hirsch, composing the firm of the City Metal Works. The record discloses that the defendant-appellant upon his own application was in due course individually adjudicated a bankrupt, and as such discharged, but in order to secure a discharge from firm debts there must be an adjudication of the firm as bankrupt, and a firm trustee appointed, where there are firm assets.” In re Meyers, 3 Am. Br. Rep. 260, 261. That not appearing, nor made so to appear by the affidavit of the appellant upon information and belief, that said claim was provable in the proceedings in bankruptcy, and your [249]*249deponent was discharged therefrom by the discharge granted therein,” the justice below properly denied his application, for it is only If it appears upon the hearing that he has been discharged from the payment of that judgment, or the debt upon which such judgment was recovered, an order must be made directing said judgment be cancelled and discharged of record.” Code Civ. Pro., § 1268.

Orders affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Davis, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodge v. Kaufman, 46 Misc. 248, 91 N.Y.S. 727 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

46 Misc. 248 (Dodge v. Kaufman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York Institution for the Instruction of the Deaf & Dumb v. Crockett
117 A.D. 269 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Berry Bros. v. Sheehan
115 A.D. 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)