Dodge v. Dodge

Circuit Court of the 2nd Circuit of Michigan

Dodge v. Dodge

1 Mich. N.P. 13

CourtCircuit Court of the 2nd Circuit of Michigan

DecidedDecember 17, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mich. N.P. 13 (Dodge v. Dodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 2nd Circuit of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dodge v. Dodge, 1 Mich. N.P. 13 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Blackman, J.

The petition upon which the Court is called to act, shows that the defendant has had an allowance of fifty-five dollars. Before an order for additional means could properly be made, the petitioner should show a proper expenditure of the previous allowance, and the purpose and sums for which further allowance is necessary to be made. This, the petition does not show.

The Court cannot, under Ch. Rule 99, upon the facts stated in this petition, order the complainant to testify orally, in open Court, as to his intercourse with the defendant.

The application must be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Blackman, J.

The petition upon which the Court is called to act, shows that the defendant has had an allowance of fifty-five dollars. Before an order for additional means could properly be made, the petitioner should show a proper expenditure of the previous allowance, and the purpose and sums for which further allowance is necessary to be made. This, the petition does not show.

The Court cannot, under Ch. Rule 99, upon the facts stated in this petition, order the complainant to testify orally, in open Court, as to his intercourse with the defendant.

The application must be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mich. N.P. 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodge-v-dodge-micirct2-1869.