Dodge v. Colozzi
40 A.D.2d 937, 337 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 2, 1972·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The city has withdrawn its objections to the award for the property. The additional allowance granted to defendant was within the proper discretion of Special Term (see Matter of Dodge v. Tierney, 40 A D 2d 936). (Appeal from part of order of Onondaga Special Term in condemnation proceeding.) Present—Marsh, J. P., Witmer, Moule, Cardamone and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dodge v. Colozzi, 40 A.D.2d 937, 337 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).
40 A.D.2d 937 (Dodge v. Colozzi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New York State Urban Development Corp. v. Goldfeld
54 A.D.2d 1099 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)