Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 480
United States Customs Court·Decided June 14, 1956·No. No. 60040; protest 252211-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mandarin oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of Fritzsche Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 480 (cusc 1956).

36 Cust. Ct. 480 (Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fritzsche Bros. v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 90 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)