Home/U.S. Customs Court/Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States

Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 480
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 14, 1956
DocketNo. 60040; protest 252211-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 480 (Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 480 (cusc 1956).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mandarin oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of Fritzsche Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fritzsche Bros. v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 90 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Cust. Ct. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodge-olcott-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1956.