Home/U.S. Customs Court/Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States

Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States

24 Cust. Ct. 415, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1812
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 4, 1950
DocketNo. 54187; protests 153987-K and 153955-K (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Cust. Ct. 415 (Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodge & Olcott, Inc. v. United States, 24 Cust. Ct. 415, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1812 (cusc 1950).

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mandarin oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of Fritzsche Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fritzsche Bros. v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 90 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Cust. Ct. 415, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodge-olcott-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1950.