Dodge & Olcott Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Dodge & Olcott Co. v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 348, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1479

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 23, 1952

DocketNo. 56799; protest 24035-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 29 Cust. Ct. 348 (Dodge & Olcott Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dodge & Olcott Co. v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 348, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1479 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476) and other items consist of mandarin oil similar to that the subject of Fritzsche Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of cornmint oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of A. Maschmeijer, Jr., Inc. v. United States (39 C. C. P. A. 139, C. A. D. 476) and other items consist of mandarin oil similar to that the subject of Fritzsche Bros., Inc. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 Cust. Ct. 348, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodge-olcott-co-v-united-states-cusc-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack