Dodds v. Sutphin Park Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Dodds v. Sutphin Park Realty Corp.

248 A.D. 759

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 759 (Dodds v. Sutphin Park Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dodds v. Sutphin Park Realty Corp., 248 A.D. 759 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Petitioner, claiming to be a stockholder, instituted proceedings to examine the books and records of the respondent corporation. The respondents alleged that the petitioner was not a stockholder and further alleged that the application was not made in good faith. An alternative order of mandamus was issued and the questions of fact were tried before the court; and it was found and decreed that the petitioner was a stockholder and was seeking the examination in good faith. Order of peremptory mandamus unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner, claiming to be a stockholder, instituted proceedings to examine the books and records of the respondent corporation. The respondents alleged that the petitioner was not a stockholder and further alleged that the application was not made in good faith. An alternative order of mandamus was issued and the questions of fact were tried before the court; and it was found and decreed that the petitioner was a stockholder and was seeking the examination in good faith. Order of peremptory mandamus unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodds-v-sutphin-park-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1936.