Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co.

1915 OK 614, 151 P. 679, 51 Okla. 25, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 924

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 7, 1915

Docket4826

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1915 OK 614 (Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dodder v. Washita Lumber Co., 1915 OK 614, 151 P. 679, 51 Okla. 25, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 924 (Okla. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion- by

McKEOWN, C.

This court will examine the transcript of the record, and case-made, to ascertain its jurisdiction; and .when there appears a purported jour-; nal entry of judgment in the case-made, and a recitation that an order was made extending time to make and serve case-made, and the purported journal entry of judgment is not shown to have been filed by the clerk of the court, or entered in the journal of the court, and no order extending time to make and serve case-made being set out in the case-made, or shown to have been filed, or entered on the journal by the clerk of the trial court, this does not present anything to this court for decision, and a purported order of the trial judge extending time in which to make and serve a case-made is without force, when the case-made fails to show affirmatively that such order was made and entered. Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669.

We recommend that this cause be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion- by

McKEOWN, C.

This court will examine the transcript of the record, and case-made, to ascertain its jurisdiction; and .when there appears a purported jour-; nal entry of judgment in the case-made, and a recitation that an order was made extending time to make and serve case-made, and the purported journal entry of judgment is not shown to have been filed by the clerk of the court, or entered in the journal of the court, and no order extending time to make and serve case-made being set out in the case-made, or shown to have been filed, or entered on the journal by the clerk of the trial court, this does not present anything to this court for decision, and a purported order of the trial judge extending time in which to make and serve a case-made is without force, when the case-made fails to show affirmatively that such order was made and entered. Town of Okemah v. Allen, 48 Okla. 757, 150 Pac. 669.

We recommend that this cause be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1915 OK 614, 151 P. 679, 51 Okla. 25, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodder-v-washita-lumber-co-okla-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack