Dodd v. State

1931 OK CR 248, 299 P. 504, 51 Okla. Crim. 42, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 23, 1931
DocketNo. A-7728.
StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 248 (Dodd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodd v. State, 1931 OK CR 248, 299 P. 504, 51 Okla. Crim. 42, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

Judgment was entered November 16, 1929, at which time defendant was given 80 days to file his appeal in this court. The appeal was lodged in this court February 13, 1930, more than 80 days after the judgment was rendered. Extensions of time were allowed in which to make *43 and serve case-made, but no extension of time was ever made in which to file the appeal in this conrt. An extension of time to make and serve case-made does not automatically extend the-time to file appeal. The appeal not having been filed within the time fixed, this conrt does not acquire jurisdiction. Aubrey v. State, 38 Okla. Cr. 271, 260 Pac. 783, and cases cited therein.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aubrey v. State
1927 OK CR 323 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK CR 248, 299 P. 504, 51 Okla. Crim. 42, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodd-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.