Dodd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Dodd v. State

817 S.W.2d 255, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 1991 WL 153015

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 13, 1991·No. No. 59555·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Appellant’s claims of error fail because the record conclusively refutes them, and the sentences assessed are within the statutory range. Appellant is not entitled to relief. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by the record, hence, not clearly erroneous. Judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Appellant’s claims of error fail because the record conclusively refutes them, and the sentences assessed are within the statutory range. Appellant is not entitled to relief. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are supported by the record, hence, not clearly erroneous. Judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Dodd v. State, 817 S.W.2d 255, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1232, 1991 WL 153015 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

817 S.W.2d 255 (Dodd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.