Dodd v. State

738 S.W.2d 486, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4515
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 4, 1987·No. No. 52488·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dodd v. State, 738 S.W.2d 486, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 4515 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

738 S.W.2d 486 (Dodd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.