Dodd v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dodd v. State

68 S.E. 656, 8 Ga. App. 106, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 55

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1910·No. 2447·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

The discretion, of the trial judge, in dismissing the motion for a new trial for failure to file the brief of the evidence within the time provided by his order, was not abused. The decision is controlled by the ruling of this court in Guthrie v. Uendley, ante, 101 (68 S. E. 654).

Judgment affirmed.

Motion for new trial; from Cobb superior court — Judge Morris. January 10, 1910.

Clay & Morris, fox plaintiff in error. J. P. Brooke, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

The discretion, of the trial judge, in dismissing the motion for a new trial for failure to file the brief of the evidence within the time provided by his order, was not abused. The decision is controlled by the ruling of this court in Guthrie v. Uendley, ante, 101 (68 S. E. 654).

Judgment affirmed.

Motion for new trial; from Cobb superior court — Judge Morris. January 10, 1910.

Clay & Morris, fox plaintiff in error. J. P. Brooke, solicitor-general, contra.

Dodd v. State, 68 S.E. 656, 8 Ga. App. 106, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

68 S.E. 656 (Dodd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related