Dodd v. State

68 S.E. 656, 8 Ga. App. 106, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 55
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1910
Docket2447
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 S.E. 656 (Dodd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodd v. State, 68 S.E. 656, 8 Ga. App. 106, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 55 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The discretion, of the trial judge, in dismissing the motion for a new trial for failure to file the brief of the evidence within the time provided by his order, was not abused. The decision is controlled by the ruling of this court in Guthrie v. Uendley, ante, 101 (68 S. E. 654).

Judgment affirmed.

Motion for new trial; from Cobb superior court — Judge Morris. January 10, 1910. Clay & Morris, fox plaintiff in error. J. P. Brooke, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freedman v. Housing Authority of City of Atlanta
136 S.E.2d 544 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 656, 8 Ga. App. 106, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodd-v-state-gactapp-1910.